0.12/0.12	% Problem    : Vampire---4.8_29135 : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0.
0.12/0.13	% Command    : run_E %s %d THM
0.14/0.34	% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
0.14/0.34	% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
0.14/0.34	% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
0.14/0.34	% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
0.14/0.34	% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
0.14/0.35	% CPULimit   : 1440
0.14/0.35	% WCLimit    : 180
0.14/0.35	% DateTime   : Mon Jul  3 12:27:08 EDT 2023
0.14/0.35	% CPUTime    : 
0.20/0.47	Running higher-order theorem provingRunning: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=180 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.kHGcOSAF08/Vampire---4.8_29135
0.20/0.48	# Version: 3.1pre001-ho
785.94/99.26	# Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNSSA.
785.94/99.26	# Scheduled 8 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total)
785.94/99.26	# Starting post_as_ho12 with 180s (1) cores
785.94/99.26	# Starting new_bool_9 with 180s (1) cores
785.94/99.26	# Starting post_as_ho1 with 180s (1) cores
785.94/99.26	# Starting post_as_ho4 with 180s (1) cores
785.94/99.26	# Starting post_as_ho2 with 180s (1) cores
785.94/99.26	# Starting ehoh_best2_full_lfho with 180s (1) cores
785.94/99.26	# Starting full_lambda_10 with 180s (1) cores
785.94/99.26	# Starting new_ho_8 with 180s (1) cores
785.94/99.26	# full_lambda_10 with pid 29319 completed with status 0
785.94/99.26	# Result found by full_lambda_10
785.94/99.26	# Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNSSA.
785.94/99.26	# Scheduled 8 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total)
785.94/99.26	# Starting post_as_ho12 with 180s (1) cores
785.94/99.26	# Starting new_bool_9 with 180s (1) cores
785.94/99.26	# Starting post_as_ho1 with 180s (1) cores
785.94/99.26	# Starting post_as_ho4 with 180s (1) cores
785.94/99.26	# Starting post_as_ho2 with 180s (1) cores
785.94/99.26	# Starting ehoh_best2_full_lfho with 180s (1) cores
785.94/99.26	# Starting full_lambda_10 with 180s (1) cores
785.94/99.26	# SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,5,,5,20000,3.0,true)
785.94/99.26	# Search class: HGUPF-FFSS11-SSSFFFNN
785.94/99.26	# partial match(2): HHUPF-FFSF11-SSSFFFNN
785.94/99.26	# Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 180 seconds (180 total)
785.94/99.26	# Starting new_ho_10 with 98s (1) cores
785.94/99.26	# new_ho_10 with pid 29326 completed with status 7
785.94/99.26	# Starting full_lambda_10 with 19s (1) cores
785.94/99.26	# full_lambda_10 with pid 29569 completed with status 0
785.94/99.26	# Result found by full_lambda_10
785.94/99.26	# Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNSSA.
785.94/99.26	# Scheduled 8 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total)
785.94/99.26	# Starting post_as_ho12 with 180s (1) cores
785.94/99.26	# Starting new_bool_9 with 180s (1) cores
785.94/99.26	# Starting post_as_ho1 with 180s (1) cores
785.94/99.26	# Starting post_as_ho4 with 180s (1) cores
785.94/99.26	# Starting post_as_ho2 with 180s (1) cores
785.94/99.26	# Starting ehoh_best2_full_lfho with 180s (1) cores
785.94/99.26	# Starting full_lambda_10 with 180s (1) cores
785.94/99.26	# SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,5,,5,20000,3.0,true)
785.94/99.26	# Search class: HGUPF-FFSS11-SSSFFFNN
785.94/99.26	# partial match(2): HHUPF-FFSF11-SSSFFFNN
785.94/99.26	# Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 180 seconds (180 total)
785.94/99.26	# Starting new_ho_10 with 98s (1) cores
785.94/99.26	# new_ho_10 with pid 29326 completed with status 7
785.94/99.26	# Starting full_lambda_10 with 19s (1) cores
785.94/99.26	# Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
785.94/99.26	# Presaturation interreduction done
785.94/99.26	
785.94/99.26	# Proof found!
785.94/99.26	# SZS status Theorem
785.94/99.26	# SZS output start CNFRefutation
785.94/99.26	thf(decl_22, type, one: $i).
785.94/99.26	thf(decl_23, type, two: $i).
785.94/99.26	thf(decl_24, type, b1: $o > $i).
785.94/99.26	thf(decl_25, type, b2: $o > $i).
785.94/99.26	thf(decl_26, type, esk1_0: $o > $i).
785.94/99.26	thf(decl_27, type, esk2_0: $o).
785.94/99.26	thf(decl_28, type, esk3_0: $o).
785.94/99.26	thf(goal, conjecture, ![X3:$o > $i]:((![X4:$o]:(((X3 @ ((X4)))!=(X3 @ (~((X4))))))=>(((X3)=(b1))|((X3)=(b2))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.kHGcOSAF08/Vampire---4.8_29135', goal)).
785.94/99.26	thf(b1, axiom, ![X2:$o]:(((((b1 @ ((X2)))=(one))<=(X2))&(~((X2))=>((b1 @ ((X2)))=(two))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.kHGcOSAF08/Vampire---4.8_29135', b1)).
785.94/99.26	thf(b2, axiom, ![X5:$o]:((((X5)=>((b2 @ ((X5)))=(two)))&(((b2 @ ((X5)))=(one))<=~((X5))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.kHGcOSAF08/Vampire---4.8_29135', b2)).
785.94/99.26	thf(binarity_exhaust, axiom, ![X1:$i]:((((X1)=(two))|((X1)=(one)))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.kHGcOSAF08/Vampire---4.8_29135', binarity_exhaust)).
785.94/99.26	thf(binarity_distinc, axiom, ((one)!=(two)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.kHGcOSAF08/Vampire---4.8_29135', binarity_distinc)).
785.94/99.26	thf(c_0_5, negated_conjecture, ~(![X3:$o > $i]:((![X4:$o]:((((X4)|((X3 @ ((X4)))!=(X3 @ $true)))&(~(X4)|((X3 @ ((X4)))!=(X3 @ $false)))))=>(((X3)=(b1))|((X3)=(b2)))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(fool_unroll,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[goal])])])).
785.94/99.26	thf(c_0_6, negated_conjecture, ![X12:$o]:(((((X12)|((esk1_0 @ ((X12)))!=(esk1_0 @ $true)))&(~(X12)|((esk1_0 @ ((X12)))!=(esk1_0 @ $false))))&(((esk1_0)!=(b1))&((esk1_0)!=(b2))))), inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])])])])).
785.94/99.26	thf(c_0_7, plain, ![X2:$o]:((((X2)=>((b1 @ ((X2)))=(one)))&(~(X2)=>((b1 @ ((X2)))=(two))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[b1])).
785.94/99.26	thf(c_0_8, negated_conjecture, ((esk1_0)!=(b1)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])).
785.94/99.26	thf(c_0_9, plain, ![X14:$o]:(((~(X14)|((b1 @ ((X14)))=(one)))&((X14)|((b1 @ ((X14)))=(two))))), inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])])).
785.94/99.26	thf(c_0_10, plain, ![X5:$o]:((((X5)=>((b2 @ ((X5)))=(two)))&(~(X5)=>((b2 @ ((X5)))=(one))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[b2])).
785.94/99.26	thf(c_0_11, negated_conjecture, ((b1 @ ((esk2_0)))!=(esk1_0 @ ((esk2_0)))), inference(neg_ext,[status(thm)],[c_0_8])).
785.94/99.26	thf(c_0_12, plain, ((b1 @ (~($true)))=(two)), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9])])])).
785.94/99.26	thf(c_0_13, plain, ![X15:$i]:((((X15)=(two))|((X15)=(one)))), inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[binarity_exhaust])).
785.94/99.26	thf(c_0_14, negated_conjecture, ((esk1_0)!=(b2)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])).
785.94/99.26	thf(c_0_15, plain, ![X13:$o]:(((~(X13)|((b2 @ ((X13)))=(two)))&((X13)|((b2 @ ((X13)))=(one))))), inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_10])])).
785.94/99.26	thf(c_0_16, plain, ((esk2_0)|((esk1_0 @ (~($true)))!=(two))), inference(local_rw,[status(thm)],[inference(ext_sup,[status(thm)],[c_0_11, c_0_12])])).
785.94/99.26	thf(c_0_17, plain, ![X1:$i]:((((X1)=(two))|((X1)=(one)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13])).
785.94/99.26	thf(c_0_18, negated_conjecture, ((b2 @ ((esk3_0)))!=(esk1_0 @ ((esk3_0)))), inference(neg_ext,[status(thm)],[c_0_14])).
785.94/99.26	thf(c_0_19, plain, ((b2 @ (($true)))=(two)), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15])])])).
785.94/99.26	thf(c_0_20, plain, ((b2 @ (~($true)))=(one)), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15])])])).
785.94/99.26	thf(c_0_21, negated_conjecture, ((esk1_0 @ (($true)))!=(esk1_0 @ (~($true)))), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])])])).
785.94/99.26	thf(c_0_22, plain, (((esk1_0 @ (~($true)))=(one))|(esk2_0)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16, c_0_17])).
785.94/99.26	thf(c_0_23, plain, (((esk1_0 @ ((esk3_0)))!=(two))|~((esk3_0))), inference(ext_sup,[status(thm)],[c_0_18, c_0_19])).
785.94/99.26	thf(c_0_24, plain, ((esk3_0)|((esk1_0 @ (~($true)))!=(one))), inference(local_rw,[status(thm)],[inference(ext_sup,[status(thm)],[c_0_18, c_0_20])])).
785.94/99.26	thf(c_0_25, plain, ((b1 @ (($true)))=(one)), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9])])])).
785.94/99.26	thf(c_0_26, negated_conjecture, ((esk2_0)|((esk1_0 @ (($true)))!=(one))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21, c_0_22])).
785.94/99.26	thf(c_0_27, plain, (((esk1_0 @ (($true)))=(one))|~((esk3_0))), inference(local_rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23, c_0_17])])).
785.94/99.26	thf(c_0_28, plain, ((esk2_0)|(esk3_0)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24, c_0_22])).
785.94/99.26	thf(c_0_29, plain, (((esk1_0 @ ((esk2_0)))!=(one))|~((esk2_0))), inference(ext_sup,[status(thm)],[c_0_11, c_0_25])).
785.94/99.26	thf(c_0_30, negated_conjecture, (esk2_0), inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26, c_0_27]), c_0_28])).
785.94/99.26	thf(c_0_31, negated_conjecture, (((esk1_0 @ (~($true)))=(one))|((esk1_0 @ (($true)))!=(two))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21, c_0_17])).
785.94/99.26	thf(c_0_32, plain, ((esk1_0 @ (($true)))!=(one)), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_29, c_0_30]), c_0_30])])).
785.94/99.26	thf(c_0_33, plain, ![X10:$i, X1:$i]:((((X1)=(one))|((X10)=(one))|((X10)=(X1)))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17, c_0_17])).
785.94/99.26	thf(c_0_34, plain, ((esk3_0)|((esk1_0 @ (($true)))!=(two))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24, c_0_31])).
785.94/99.26	thf(c_0_35, plain, ![X1:$i]:((((X1)=(esk1_0 @ (($true))))|((X1)=(one)))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_32, c_0_33])).
785.94/99.26	thf(c_0_36, plain, ~((esk3_0)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_32, c_0_27])).
785.94/99.26	thf(c_0_37, plain, ((one)!=(two)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[binarity_distinc])).
785.94/99.26	thf(c_0_38, plain, ($false), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_34, c_0_35]), c_0_36])]), c_0_37]), ['proof']).
785.94/99.26	# SZS output end CNFRefutation
785.94/99.26	# Parsed axioms                        : 9
785.94/99.26	# Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 4
785.94/99.26	# Initial clauses                      : 10
785.94/99.26	# Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
785.94/99.26	# Initial clauses in saturation        : 10
785.94/99.26	# Processed clauses                    : 54
785.94/99.26	# ...of these trivial                  : 0
785.94/99.26	# ...subsumed                          : 14
785.94/99.26	# ...remaining for further processing  : 40
785.94/99.26	# Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 13
785.94/99.26	# Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
785.94/99.26	# Backward-subsumed                    : 4
785.94/99.26	# Backward-rewritten                   : 7
785.94/99.26	# Generated clauses                    : 182
785.94/99.26	# ...of the previous two non-redundant : 113
785.94/99.26	# ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
785.94/99.26	# Contextual simplify-reflections      : 1
785.94/99.26	# Paramodulations                      : 132
785.94/99.26	# Factorizations                       : 28
785.94/99.26	# NegExts                              : 2
785.94/99.26	# Equation resolutions                 : 13
785.94/99.26	# Total rewrite steps                  : 31
785.94/99.26	# Propositional unsat checks           : 0
785.94/99.26	#    Propositional check models        : 0
785.94/99.26	#    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
785.94/99.26	#    Propositional clauses             : 0
785.94/99.26	#    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
785.94/99.26	#    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
785.94/99.26	#    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
785.94/99.26	#    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
785.94/99.26	#    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
785.94/99.26	#    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
785.94/99.26	#    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
785.94/99.26	#    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
785.94/99.26	# Current number of processed clauses  : 20
785.94/99.26	#    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 5
785.94/99.26	#    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
785.94/99.26	#    Negative unit clauses             : 7
785.94/99.26	#    Non-unit-clauses                  : 8
785.94/99.26	# Current number of unprocessed clauses: 66
785.94/99.26	# ...number of literals in the above   : 183
785.94/99.26	# Current number of archived formulas  : 0
785.94/99.26	# Current number of archived clauses   : 20
785.94/99.26	# Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 32
785.94/99.26	# Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 28
785.94/99.26	# Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 8
785.94/99.26	# Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 15
785.94/99.26	# Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
785.94/99.26	# BW rewrite match attempts            : 1
785.94/99.26	# BW rewrite match successes           : 1
785.94/99.26	# Condensation attempts                : 54
785.94/99.26	# Condensation successes               : 3
785.94/99.26	# Termbank termtop insertions          : 1158
785.94/99.26	
785.94/99.26	# -------------------------------------------------
785.94/99.26	# User time                : 97.086 s
785.94/99.26	# System time              : 1.016 s
785.94/99.26	# Total time               : 98.102 s
785.94/99.26	# Maximum resident set size: 1872 pages
787.55/99.47	
787.55/99.47	# -------------------------------------------------
787.55/99.47	# User time                : 97.086 s
787.55/99.47	# System time              : 1.022 s
787.55/99.47	# Total time               : 98.108 s
787.55/99.47	# Maximum resident set size: 1724 pages
787.55/99.47	% E---3.1 exiting
787.55/99.47	EOF